I just came across a review titled
Taking Semiotics to Church in the Other Journal by Carl Raschke of Crystal Downing's new book
Changing Signs of Truth: A Christian Introduction to the Semiotics of Communication. The last two paragraphs are below. I highlighted the next to the last sentence because it strikes a chord with me. I decided to download the book to my Kindle. Carl wrote "Next Reformation." A book I found very helpful. I also read Crystal's other book
How Postmodernism Serves My Faith. It was great.
Changing Signs of Truth is a valuable contribution to the
academic and semi-academic literature on cultural semiotics, if only
because it portrays in a thorough and engaging way the glaring problem
of how language is intertwined with culture and, more importantly, how
language evolves over time. Interestingly, the same kinds of points
Downing makes about contemporary Western culture would be a no-brainer
for missiologists having to contend with the challenges of making the
gospel intelligible to non-Westerners. It is a genuine sign of
our current age that the controversy over language and culture has come
down to whether the meanings of religious terms are somehow set in
stone, as the more orthodox instinctively assume, or whether they are
simply episodic types of language games, conditioned and rendered
contingent by present-day attitudes and practices.
The view that these meanings are set in stone, as I have remarked extensively in my earlier work The Next Reformation
(2004), relies on a pseudo-universalistic and hyperrationalistic
version of epistemology that is neither biblical nor ancient but
thoroughly modern, dating no later than the late eighteenth century. The
notion that they are merely historically contingent amounts to an
uncritical and inconsistent form of intellectual laissez-faire fostered
during the late industrial era by social scientists who somehow fell
under the delusion that they were in the business of solving classical
problems of theoretical knowledge, when in fact they were merely
substituting a naive descriptivism for what used to count as a
philosophy of knowledge.
God will undoubtedly not allow the future of Christianity to endure
as an interminable mud fight between shallow inerrantists and smug
liberals. But in the meantime, readers will take away from this little
book some genuine insights in how to rise above the fray.
1 comment:
I am trying to figure out how I missed this work. I am working on a paper in which I address the function and attitudes of Christian. I also look at our perception, or coloring, of Christ. Take a look at the work "American Jesus." Excellent!
Post a Comment