The "posthuman" refers to the fact that there is
"a new and growing appreciation for the
plasticity and flexibility of 'human nature'
spurred by discoveries in biotechnology
and virtual, information and communication
technologies."
Like it or not we humans are changing ourselves. It is going to happen, no it is happening already. We can already replace some organs with manufactured versions. A person can change their gender. Technology continues to expand the range of human senses and performance. It cannot be imagined that this will not continue. Not unless there is a world wide catastrophe casting us back into a dark age and our technical skills forgotten. It is inevitable. Jen's book assumes this and aims to engage it. She informs us that the term "posthuman" is an open one.
"In this book, I argue that these multiple and competing notions of the posthuman currently crystallize around two distinct and promising visions, cyborgs and uploads."She also says,
"If, as N. Katherine Hayles contends, we are at a crucial historical juncture with regard to our emerging posthuman future, such that we bear a moral responsibility in the visioning and construction of our future selves, the stakes are high; theologians must know precisely what is at stake in order to contribute helpfully to the process of fashioning a faithful posthuman future.
The reader may experience some discomfort in thinking about the changes that may and will occur. Time honored notions of what is normal and what is natural and what is human nature will no doubt be questioned and violated. What does this mean for religion and theology? This book aims to clarify the state of things and prepare for and is an example of rational engagement across the boundaries of technology, science and theology.
4 comments:
Sounds interesting. I might take a look at it.
Thanks so much! I'm all a-twitter that 1) someone would plunk down the big bucks who's not required to and 2) a REVIEW!!!
Squeeeeeeeee!
Jenny, I am enjoying it very much. I have loved technology as long as I can remember and it is my occupation. So the book is of great interest to me. So, more Campbellite than Lipscomb, eh? That is intriguing. Don't know that much about their similarities and differences. Perhaps should dust off the Lipscomb biography I inherited. My younger son, Class of 2010, had a great experience at Lipcomb U.
JTB, spent a peaceful hour with your book in the quiet of the morning just now. Must have been pretty difficult integrating the many different style of sources, some of them from scholarly journals but many others from all over the place.
Post a Comment