Tuesday, April 11, 2006
Physics and Consciousness
So little time and so much to do. What is discomforting, as a physicist, about my narrative below is that it is only an argument from analogy. What we'd really like to do is derive an equation that shows what conscious experience is and how it works. But we don't know how to do that. We are not even close. And no one really has any idea. People like David Chalmers acknowledge this and at least state the problem correctly. Understanding the brain is difficult enough. But even knowing the physiological correlates of consciousness do not tell us what it is. We may know something about how the electrical impulses move about as I lift my arm. But we have no idea how it is that I can do that. I can lift my arm, change my heart rate, and change my body chemistry. If I were a young man again, research in this area might be the path I'd take.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(86)
-
▼
April
(14)
- I didn't rig this
- Intelligent Design and Alfred North Whitehead
- Science and the Modern World - Alfred North Whitehead
- Creation, Wisdom and the Mystical
- I find this edifying
- Yet Another Transitional Fossil
- Spiritual Pollution
- Idea Progression- Bible - Gospel of Thomas
- Early Morning Thoughts while Thinking about the Go...
- The Spectrum of Consciousness
- Physics and Consciousness
- Physics and Emergence
- Music and the Meaning of Life
- Process Theology
-
▼
April
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment